this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
5 points (77.8% liked)

World News

32079 readers
1226 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... Sure there are major improvements that can be had in the US, but punishment and consequences as defined in Sharia law isn't exactly something that the US can simply adopt.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Three million dead due to the Afghanistan war alone wasn't brutal enough for you?

The systematic, institutional rape and torture of men, women, and children in Abu Ghraib was more brutal than anything defined in Sharia law but we still pretend that the occupation was clean.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both can be wrong, Sounds like you’re just here to derail into having a different conversation you want to have entirely separate to the topic rather than addressing the actual topic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm staying on topic.

I am demonstrating how the American occupational forces handed out harsher punishments and consequences than the Taliban did, yet couldn't curb opium production. Ergo, the Americans were never interested in curbing opium production.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Americans didn't intend to kill all those people. They intended to kill soldiers, and lots of other people who they deemed evil, but growing drugs was never deemed evil enough to be worth killing someone over. The Taliban intended to kill those growing drugs, along with a lot of other people doing things they deem to be evil I'll leave moral judgements to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

LOL
No one I served with gave two shits who they were killing or why