this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
151 points (98.1% liked)

News

25601 readers
3919 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in a lawsuit brought by Mexico seeking to hold U.S. gun companies liable for firearm trafficking that fuels cartel violence.

Mexico argues that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) does not shield gunmakers who knowingly facilitate illegal sales.

Lower courts disagreed on whether the "predicate exception" applies, prompting the Supreme Court to step in.

If the ruling favors Mexico, it could open legal avenues for similar suits. Gunmakers contend Mexico's claims fail due to multiple intervening steps before guns reach cartels.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I think they would if more CEOs get gunned down.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Even then - I doubt it.

But it's probably still worth testing that experiment... for science

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The NRA was suddenly in favor of gun control after the Black Panthers started patrolling with guns.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

The NRA was suddenly in favor of gun control after the Black Panthers started patrolling with guns.

I despise the NRA but this kind of revisionist history needs to be called out.

First off prior to 1977 the NRA had an established history of supporting Gun Control. It didn't suddenly pop into being because of the Black Panthers.

Second when the Mulford Act was passed in 1967 it started a sea change at the NRA that culminated with the "Revolt at Cincinnati" in 1977. The NRA as an organization supported Mulford, like it had other Gun Control legislation for at least 50 years, but it's very clear that their membership did NOT and they took over the organization to keep it from continuing.

Today's NRA is a completely different beast than the one that existed in 1967. It's primary faults are that it got corrupt as fuck and that it's entirely silent whenever there's a conflict between lawful gun owners and law enforcement.

Regardless, the point stands. The NRA wasn't "suddenly in favor of gun control after the Black Panthers", it already had multi-decade history of supporting Gun Control.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Interesting history lesson.

So, is your stance that a leftwing armed resistance movement shooting CEOs wouldn't cause the right-wing gun lobby to support gun control like they used to?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Modern gun control laws started in response to black people arming themselves.

From the stamp act to reagan, to bill Clinton. Reagan specifically is why California is ahead of the rest of the US on laws banning firearms, because Reagan kicked it off while Governor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

Modern gun control laws started in response to black people arming themselves.

Using the word "modern" lessens the message. Gun Control has always always always been about keeping minorities from arming themselves and the racist trash are still at it today.

https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/69d9d636-029c-4788-aee2-f6c306d72b39.jpeg

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Can't have Black people walking around with the ability to defend themselves from murder.