this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
217 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59091 readers
3545 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
217
Court rules automakers can record and intercept owner text messages (therecord.media)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A Seattle-based appellate judge ruled that the practice does not meet the threshold for an illegal privacy violation under state law, handing a big win to automakers Honda, Toyota, Volkswagen and General Motors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Appellate court (appellate judge) aka second instance court. So while not the end of discussion, that is quite absurd.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

I'm short of time so I haven't found the original complaint but according to the appeals court ruling, the plaintiffs never claimed any actual damages. The heading of the law in question is "Violating right of privacy—Civil action—Liability for damages."

Is this a privacy violation? Yes. Did these people suffer any actual damages under the law? Evidently not.