this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
494 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
4665 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If you generate the power where it is used without pollution, we should.

Generators take space, require maintenance, and have a certain optimal capacity that isn't necessarily hit on a given roof.

For wind energy in particular, the bigger the turbine, the more yield per $ spent. If you go out to Corpus Christi you'll see these enormous turbines - $10M to $50M / ea - that generate on the order of $24 to $75 per MWh, or $.024-.075/kWh. Home wind/solar don't get anywhere close to that.

Prime placement of units, distribution across a wide area, and a degree of storage capacity means you're going to get better and more consistent yield.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

welcome to the land of windmills