politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I mean, this is actually valid. Pennies cost more than a penny to make. I don't think anyone likes pennies. I wish we'd done this a long time ago; it's not the first time it's been discussed. First thing I've heard of Trump wanting to do that didn't piss me off, to be honest.
They should really stop minting anything smaller than a quarter.
he don't actually care about that. he'd figure some way to make 'em cost even more, so he can take a cut of the action.
he's just got a beef with lincoln.. for reasons
but for now, lets just toss this on the pile of things he's doing or saying without legislative authority.
There's an issue with this in the real world - if enough people ignore legislative authority or some legal mechanism, then it's not the people who are powerless, it's the mechanism.
So - he didn't do a lot in his first term. But his opposition (the one with power support, popular support alone is not sufficient) shat its pants again, after Obama (who's been even given a second chance by the populace) with Biden and with the exact way they lost the election.
He might feel bolder and actually do things outside any formal authority which will materialize.
Trump also had people organizing for Trump's second term in a way they hadn't for the first term. There was no Project 2017 equivalent and the main person with any governing experience around the transition was fired due to a family grudge.
The last coin to be removed from circulation was the half penny, or hay-penny. At the time they stopped minting it, it had the buying power of 18 cents.
We could stop minting pennies, nickels, and dimes, all of which cost more than their face value to mint.
Trump is a fucking moron and a fascist, but rapist clocks are right twice a day.
Edit: I looked it up, and I was wrong. The dime does not cost more to mint than its face value, but the penny and the nickel do. The dime is still functionally worthless, and could easily be removed from circulation without affecting commerce.
I had a weird pluto-esque reaction, like, 'aw, but dimes are my favorite!' I didn't even know I had a favorite. Why???
I think if it'd be more practical to get rid of them, we should.
Dimes would make a fine choice for the smallest denomination. You could still divide dollars to the nearest tenth of a dollar, which is more than sufficient. They have no buying power by themselves, but a stack can buy something.
A stack of pennies is still garbage.
Sounds a bit too metric to me. The smallest denomination should be 1/12th of a dollar.
They're small but worth more. That's neat
This would only make sense if we only used the coin once. It does not matter that it costs more to mint the coin as they are not single use items.
What getting rid of small change does is directly harm the less well off.
I'm not sure the cost to make vs value is really the best measurement, within reason. At the end of the day society gets a tool to measure a unit of wealth to easily transfer, and there is value in having that.
That said! Yeah. The US had a half-penny until 1857. I can look at an inflation calculator that only goes back to 1913, and half a penny then was worth 16¢ today. We don't need the penny anymore.
We don't need the nickel or dime either.
megacorps can't nickel and dime us if we have no nickels.. or dimes.. economy fixed!
can't give someone your two cents worth if you haven't got two pennies to give. free speech should obviously cost more than that, anyhow. apparently that price is somewhere between $15 million and $20 billion.
We know that freedom cost a buck o' five so the nickle may be next on the chopping block.
Yeah it's weird that people just accept what he says that the value is solely in the face value of the currency. If we stick with that method, it's only a matter of time before trump realizes how much profit he makes by printing a $100 bill.
We did it in Canada a while ago and it’s been fine.
Nickels are far more expensive to make compared to face value
Far more? From this article, updated today it says:
From this it seems pennys are 50% more expensive to make in comparitive value compared to a nickel.
It’s a valid thing we should have done a while ago, but can the president actually just do it? I mean, I know he “can” if people let him but, like, doesn’t that in theory require an act of Congress?
I don't think he can. If he somehow illegally forces the US Mint to stop making pennies, it doesn't solve the problem that no law allows stores to just round to the nearest 5 cents. Congress would need to pass that first.
Isn't this largely on stores to change their prices? It's not like they'd still be selling things at $0.99 and charging you $1.00, they'd just change their advertised prices to be rounded up to the nearest $0.05.
That said, you're probably right in that he can't just do it.
With taxes it can be unpredictable as you add multiple items together.
In Canada they passed a law around rounding when they did this so it's clear set rules.
Edit: they also took them out of circulation. They didn't just stop minting them.
No?
Say there is a tax of x and someone purchases both a and b.
The total would be:
As long as all items result in an amount that doesn't have to be rounded if purchased individually then the combined amount will not have to be rounded either.
When you do %'s on totals you'll get something like $11.553
Which is fine for a single item, they'll round that down to $11.55 but when you start combining them, you're off. You don't round individual items or you can be off by a lot, you round the final one (edit: or maybe they truncate it I don't know).
Ah, we're both right.
I assumed that the tax would result in whole numbers but upon further inspection (i.e. trying it out it in a calculator) it turns out that few prices would result in values that don't have overhanging millidollars.
The solution is obviously to force prices to be whole dollar and to further allow sale taxes only in increments of 5%.
My inner child died a little, knowing there are no 1c candies from my past in your future.
Up to three things now I can name that aren't insane or 100% self-serving:
$85 million is peanuts to the Federal Government, but cash in general is becoming quite outmoded and nobody may even notice if new bills and coins were only minted every other year.
Broken clocks and all that.
Plus there is a decent chance that there is some devious way of implementing each thing to make them negatives instead of the positives they appear to be. Not planned by Trump, but by the people who wrote and put the orders in front of him.
Let's hope this is not an omen of rising inflation.
Canada did it years ago.
Ends up being a benefit for companies since they ensure that all prices inevitably round up when you use cash.
Other than that it's a non issue if you don't use cash.
Whenever I get pennies (or any change less than a quarter, really, and only then because quarters are useful for vending machines), it goes into the 'Take a penny, leave a penny' cup or a tip jar anyway. I use cash rarely enough as it is and I hate having change in my pocket.
Trump having his own rival currency is the omen of rising inflation. We thought congresspeople holding stocks was bad.