this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
571 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

4975 readers
1081 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It is implausible, that's why it's so important that Jesus did it

Without miracles, Jesus would just be some madman walking about claiming to be God yet not being able to prove it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Why isn't it plausible

It is implausible

I'm so confused by you right now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You said the story or Jesus was implausible, then elaborated on the miracles. The miracles are implausible. But if Jesus truly is God, then He could do the implausible. So the miracles don't render the story as a whole implausible, because the story is claiming that it was God Himself performing said miracles, which would make sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

It seems pretty clear that someone saying they find the story of Jesus implausible is by extension saying they find the existence of God implausible. Which would make sense.