this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
282 points (98.6% liked)

News

24269 readers
4321 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A report indicates that roughly 150,000 Korean nationals in the U.S. are subject to deportations ordered by Donald Trump, among 14 million migrants overall.

Among those, 20,000 Korean adoptees remain without citizenship, intensifying community fears and concern over harsh immigration policies amid escalating anti-immigrant rhetoric.

Kim Dong-suk, head of the grassroots group, described Trump’s return as a disaster for Koreans, urging collective action among U.S. leaders and migrant groups.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

So does this mean that there are 20,000 Koreans listed that are registered for citizenship but are just stuck in processing, and the remaining 120,000 are here illegally? If so I can see why they are deporting the 120,000 but, I don't understand why they are deporting the 20,000 as if they are here legally they should have visas showing their status of being here.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

There's a really fucked up issue in Korean adoption that was fixed a while back. Basically, once a parent finished the process and had custody of the child in the US, the parent needed to do an additional bit of paperwork to give the child US citizenship.

They closed the loophole a long time ago, but many(20 fucking thousand potentially) adult adoptees don't even know their parents didn't bother to finish the process.

Now the Korean international adoption processes is mostly closed, cause it was an exploitive nightmare that was more like selling babies than anything.

And yeah the other are just people overstaying a visa, or stayed past the point of needing a visa. 90 days.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The options are not "seeking citizenship" and "here illegally". Most of those people are here on student visas or work visas of one kind of another.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's understandable I forgot about work/student non-immigrant visa's, these still fall under a legal visa, I don't understand why people with legal visas are being the target. They are in the country legally, there shouldn't be any grounds for deportation for those. Being said after looking into it, it doesn't seem like they need a reason to deport valid visa holders, which is screwed up honestly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

They have already announced plans to deport the Haitians in Springfield that are here legally too. I don't know why anyone is shocked by this.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It seems unlikely to me that there are 120k or 130k South Koreans in the United States without legal immigration status. They probably have visas that can be revoked more easily.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I did a little research on this, and this is insane. The current legal code (8 USC 1201(i)) states

After the issuance of a visa or other documentation to any alien, the consular officer or the Secretary of State may at any time, in his discretion, revoke such visa or other documentation.

and to top it off, it also contains at the end

There shall be no means of judicial review (including review pursuant to section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision, and sections 1361 and 1651 of such title) of a revocation under this subsection, except in the context of a removal proceeding if such revocation provides the sole ground for removal under section 1227(a)(1)(B) of this title.

This sounds like it means that if there is any type of other thing happening (such as an accusation that you broke the law or are here illegally), they can just say "ok visa revoked get out" with very limited possibility to a legal review

I can understand that being the case for actual criminals but, that seems super extreme.

Being said though, 9 FAM 403.11 is the declassified guidelines that it seems officials are supposed to use, and those state:

  • (1) Unavailable
  • (2) (U) The individual is not eligible for the visa classification (this includes ineligibility under INA 214(b));
  • (3) (U) The visa has been physically removed from the passport in which it was issued; or
  • (4) (U) The individual is subject to an IDENT Watchlist record in System Messages for an arrest or conviction of driving under the influence, driving while intoxicated, or similar arrests/convictions (DUI) that occurred within the previous five years, pursuant to 9 FAM 403.11-5(B) paragraph c, below.

Overall, that's fucked.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm assuming it's because they aren't white, which is a sad thing to say/think.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 18 hours ago

Racism, in the United States? Stay it ain't so!