Open Source

32628 readers

757 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

378

Proton's biased article on Deepseek (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

174 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just because the average consumer doesn’t have the hardware to use it in a private manner does not mean it’s not achievable. The article straight up pretends self hosting doesn’t exist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

of course, move the ducking goalposts! buying a big yacht is also achievable, technically! but very little of the people can actually do it.

don't forget what did OP say:

failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers

don't believe me? look at the post text. this is as large a misunderstanding as the Eiffel Tower. Virtually nobody can run it on their private devices, that fraction of a percent is basically a rounding error.

I'm so tired of this fucking bullshit. but let's hate proton for it if that's what's trendy!