this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
436 points (97.0% liked)

World News

39757 readers
3132 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Not to beat the dead horse but... Those who said "I won't vote Democratic because Gaza" were either lying or delusional.

In 2028 there won't be any Gaza, what will be the next line?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

People who still believe you have to choice either between red and blue are delusional.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

That's just self-indugent tribalist scapegoating using an argument which is circular and self-disproving.

  • If there were too few people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to affect the vote, which is would justify the decision of the Democrat leadership to not do anything meaningful to agree with the demands of those voters (Biden pausing his own decision of sending 2000lb bombs is very much a "I'm saving you from myself" moment), then you can't really blame those few people for the Democrat loss since there were not enought of them to make a difference and something else made the Democracts lose, so the fault is in the strategy followed by the Democrat leadership on other subjects.
  • If on the other hand there were so many people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to result in the Democrats losing the vote, why did the Democrat candidates not go after that vote? Again, the blame is down to the choices of the Democrat leadership: it's always easier to change what a handfull of people do than to change what millions do, so for the handful of people in the Democrat Party leadership to change their position with regards to supporting Israeli in its Genocide would be far more logical to expect in that scenario than for such a large slice of the electorate - millions of voters - to change their position instead. Even if one thinks "our leader's position is more important than that of millions of people so it's the millions who have to change their positions, not our leader" (a bootlicker's mindset, BTW), it's still incredibly stupid to go with "we're going to convince millions to change their position rather than just that one guy" as a strategy so the blame still rests with those who chose to go with it.

All I see here and now is people making a pseudo-"argument" that is entirelly reliant on the axiom that "the boss is always right" to manage to somehow blame millions for something which the "the boss" could have (per the part of that very same pseudo-"argument" which claims it was the people who were against the Israeli Genocide that sawyed the vote) easilly avoided by just meaningufully changing his position on just that one subject. That presumption that the leaders are blameless and it's the peons who are to blame for not being willing to follow the leaders no mater what they were doing, is a 100% subservient mindset.

If you're going to assign blame for Trump, look at the handful of people in the Democrat Party who chose to do things in such a way that the results was that millions of their own electorate chose not to vote for them, thus delivering the election to Trump.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

And the gold medal for mental gymnastics goes to...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Sorry, didn't pass the second line because you failed to understand what I say.

I'm not saying Biden is good for Gaza. I'm saying if your concern is Gaza, Trump is not better. So for a meaningless virtue signaling, everything else is worse.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

One way to end a genocide is to 100% the ethnic cleansing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, but when do they ever stop at just one group? When the Nazis started running low on Jews to scapegoat, they expanded their operation to include gays, gypsies, handicapped...etc.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is the tragic truth.

The most frustrating part about it is that withholding votes was framed as a principled position. And I’m sorry, but that’s asinine. How many of those people who declared that they wouldn’t vote for the democratic ticket because of their action/inaction on Gaza actually did anything more than posting rants on social media? How many raised funds for aid? How many organized rallies, protests, or educational outreach? How many even so much as contacted their representatives?

It is either naivety or complacency to believe that national policy should change just because you and your friends sent around some memes. And it is callous indifference to base your vote on a single issue and then claim that you’re inhabiting the moral high ground.

If you yell into the void, you shouldn’t expect a response. And if you believe in an issue, either take action or acknowledge that it would be staggeringly arrogant to expect other people to put in work that you yourself won’t do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

The American non-Republican voters were played like a fiddle. Long live Tik Tok who fed the indignation and enabled Trump's victory!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago

I really tried to tell them, but the propaganda is insane.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

I think most of them were state sponsored psyops or really shit trolls. I don't think most actual real marginally rational thinking people would have such a dumb af take.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

Trump being elected is enough proof for me to realize most people in our country have dumb af takes.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 23 hours ago

You would think, and yet they're still around parrotting the same narrative. Hell, there's at least one in the comments of this very post.

Assuming that anyone with a contrary opinion, no matter how ridiculous you might feel it is, is being disingenuous is an easy way to underestimate them.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago

As if you need any additional evidence how .ml and their spinoffs are funded

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think most Americans care enough about Gaza for it to affect their vote (or for it to cause them to choose not to vote). Some, certainly, but not enough to have made a difference. This was about groceries being expensive.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

The numbers seem to tell a different story, actually. Mind you, this is one poll and it’s among people who did not vote giving a reason for not voting after having not voted, but the numbers aren’t insignificant

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/kamala-harris-gaza-israel-biden-election-poll?r=2y9nd&showWelcomeOnShare=false

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It was a combined effort to suppress voter turnout. Provide every possible reason to tap into that bernie bro "the democrats deserve to lose because they betrayed me" mindset.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

TBH the Dems deserved to lose, but Trump deserved to lose much, much, much, much harder.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The problem being that means too many people don't show up, and only the fanatics get a say. And they have a lot more than us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's exactly my point. People should go and vote against fascism, but apparently they won't.

And Harris wasn't inspiring enough to get them out to vote for her instead of just against him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Your point seemed to be "She sucks, maybe not as much as the other guy, but still sucks", which is not exactly inspiring in and of itself. maybe you should do less to try and discredit the currently most viable defense we have against people like Trump.

You have serious problems if you needs additional inspiration beyond literal fascism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Thank God some lemmys here have actual brains. These folks will scream up and down the street to anyone who will listen how horrible the Dem candidate is, and then wonder why voter turnout is low despite swearing they "totally went out and voted for Dems" even when they didn't want to. Sure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

I never spoke out about the Dem candidate before the election. It had its stakes, and backing the blue no matter who made sense then.

After the election loss, now, is the time to reflect and see what went wrong.

You can't replace the voters, so if nothing changes now, nothing will change in four years

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That fake "Bernie bro" mindset, you mean. No genuine Bernie bro failed to vote (D) in the general, by definition, because that's what Bernie himself recommended.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They've already made inroads into the West Bank, Syria, and Lebanon, right?