this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
788 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59658 readers
2703 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
788
Amazon's drone delivery program is the joke it always sounded like. (news.yahoo.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Only one item can be delivered at a time. It can’t weigh more than 5 pounds. It can’t be too big. It can’t be something breakable, since the drone drops it from 12 feet. The drones can’t fly when it is too hot or too windy or too rainy.

You need to be home to put out the landing target and to make sure that a porch pirate doesn’t make off with your item or that it doesn’t roll into the street (which happened once to Lord and Silverman). But your car can’t be in the driveway. Letting the drone land in the backyard would avoid some of these problems, but not if there are trees.

Amazon has also warned customers that drone delivery is unavailable during periods of high demand for drone delivery.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree with you with the efficiency comment. In an ideal scenario, deliver by air can be super efficient. No road obstacles, shortest path trajectories, hell, the sky is 3D!

It's been tried before: messenger pigeons.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It can be efficient, but the major pro-land point is: what would it do having 0 fuel?

A car would stop, a drone would drop.

It's an exception and no one would pilot a drone to it's exhaustion, but either way holding it in the air is a costy investment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How do robo-taxis or electric bikes for rent deal with the fuel problem? It's an already solved issue.

However, you do have a point with malfunctions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those don't tend to fall out of the sky when they run out of power.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Understood, but then robotaxis have run over people without the need of flying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

E-bikes and e-scooters are better, but I haven't personally seen an infrastructure to use them unless they are personally owned and recharged at home. Are there stations for them in the US?

Robo-taxis though are their own can of worms. Discussion about their capabilities can take days.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how it works in the U.S., but in Europe there are stations in which users are encouraged to go to and grab a recharged battery (for a discount.) I'm guessing they have employees who do this as well..