this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
114 points (98.3% liked)

Open Source

33187 readers
145 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
114
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I've seen some comments about how "gitlab bad" or whatnot, why do people prefer Codeberg over GitLab?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I tried Codeberg, but I dislike a lot the Woodpecker-CI (a fork from Drone-CI) and I had issues as when I tried it (a year ago) it was still on beta and on development while GitLab had a very powerful and robust CI, which is what made me quit Codeberg and get back to GitLab. ๐Ÿฅฒ

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

@SNFi Woodpecker passed 1.0 recently and it's much better. Try it again.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Afaik they use their own CI now, which aims to be compatible with the github ci

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, I need to check it again! ๐Ÿ™‚

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

afaik the aim isn't to be compatible, they just found Github Actions to be the most comfortable to use and as such based their own system around it with the liberty of breaking changes should they think it neccessary

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're probably right, I hope though that they'll try to maintain compatibility at least so that even if the Gitea Actions format changes, it would still accept and be able to use the Github Actions files