this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
358 points (97.4% liked)

Privacy

4514 readers
97 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new "king"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Don't agree completely. Celebrities are people too, they can use their voice to do good and activate people with regards to politics. Kinda cruel to just say "focus on what you're known for, which is a pretty face. I don't care about anything else that makes you human"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

I feel like the rules are different here. This dude is not a celebrity, he is a CEO of a company which mission is to provide a secure and private email service. I don't care about him as a person, he represents his company here. His job is to make sure that the data of his customers does not get in the wrong hands, and being as apolitical as possible is part of it. (Unless it's speaking up against laws that will undermine his business such as banning encryption, but that's not what's happening here).

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Their reach means they should shut up when it comes to things they have no credibility in. I don't want a physics professor giving their opinion on RNA vaccines in their class just like I don't want the singer for a major band giving their opinion on politics.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know what the physics professor and singer have in common? They can both cast a vote and partake in politics.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

I understand concern about scientific concepts, but who in your mind has the authority to talk about politics? IMO everyone should have freedom to talk about it, because when it comes to politics no one really is an "expert".