Asklemmy

44331 readers

1032 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What is the legitimate use-case for generative AI? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 19 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I promise this question is asked in good faith. I do not currently see the point of generative AI and I want to understand why there's hype. There are ethical concerns but we'll ignore ethics for the question.

In creative works like writing or art, it feels soulless and poor quality. In programming at best it's a shortcut to avoid deeper learning, at worst it spits out garbage code that you spend more time debugging than if you had just written it by yourself.

When I see AI ads directed towards individuals the selling point is convenience. But I would feel robbed of the human experience using AI in place of human interaction.

So what's the point of it all?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

AI is huge in video games for upscaling tech like DLSS which can boost performance by running the game at a low resolution then upscaling it, the result is genuinely great

frame gen is blurry af and eats shit on any fast motion. rendering games at 640x480 and then scaling them to sensible resolutions is horrible artistic practice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

rendering games at 640x480 and then scaling them to sensible resolutions is horrible artistic practice.

Is that a reason a lot of pixel art games are looking like shit? I remember the era of 320x240 and 640x480 and the modern pixel art are looking noticeably worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

that's probably more to do with a lack of dithering and not using tubes anymore. lots of those older games looked better on crt than they do on digital

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

a good example is dracula's eyes in symphony of the night, on crt the red bleeds over giving a really good red eyes effect
on lcd they are just single red pixels and look awful

load more comments (1 replies)