this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
63 points (77.9% liked)
Asklemmy
44331 readers
963 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because it's censorship by the goverment? also all the bad shit you mentioned can be easily found in most other social media too, should those be banned as well then?
Probably, yes. Or at least regulated. Modern socmed is a fucking plague.
Trusting the goverment to do that without ulterior motives makes no sense, regardless of what you think of social media.
Perhaps not the government, but for example the EU and GDPR is kinda great. Seeing this style of regulation put in place for social media is of utmost priority IMHO. Peoples brains are fucking fried, mine included, and I've been off basically all social media platforms for years now.
FYI, the EU commission is proposing basically mass surveillance too.
Link is german. hope you can find a translator.
Yep, I'm aware, and I'm sternly against it. My statement wasn't meant to imply that the EU should be trusted implicitly