this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
115 points (96.7% liked)

Asklemmy

44331 readers
920 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tangentially related:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If everyone resets, and their memory is retained, then perhaps less would change than you’d expect. For example, if you wanted to organise an event for the following day (ie today, but again), then it’s still possible to plan. In which case, many things about life actually stay the same. Only the physicality of things actually change. For people not already suffering, it’s actually a great mechanism for freedom, since the shackles of money, food, health etc are no longer a concern.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Many things change when material needs are vanished. I'd like to think people would eventually find ways to start the day by bringing food to starving, euthanasia for suffering, and similar since this is the only real gratification when self gratification finally runs out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think the opposite. The starving and suffering would be abandoned, because any attempt to ease it is futile. Their suffering begins again tomorrow, right where they were today.

I think people would help initially, but eventual acceptance that it’s pointless and nothing you can do for them makes any difference, would inevitably lead to anyone that can’t be helped being forsaken. There would be a few saints no doubt, but they’d be in the minority. How many times could you euthanise someone before there’s no longer any emotion it?

It’s bleak, but it’s human.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What can you do that makes a difference? Only things for people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Point being, that it doesn’t make a difference. All it really does is make you feel briefly better for trying to help. Next day, back to suffering.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unless you loop on the last day of the worst pain of cancer.

The key difference in planning would be lack of physical object storage. No notes would be retained.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, as I say, for those not already suffering.

Those that were suffering, would be abandoned. Once people realise it’s hopeless, their care would cease. Maybe not initially, but inevitably. Like the guy from The Beach that gets wounded by the shark. The rest will go on and the sick will be forgotten.

For the planning aspect, lack of notes shouldn’t matter. Populations would coordinate locally, and as long as you can remember what you’re supposed to be doing the “next” day, you’re golden.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That would be hell for the dying person to die every day and hell for the caretaker of that person to either kill them every morning or leave them to suffer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Exactly. At some point, most people will choose to forget, for their own sanity. We’re talking infinite repetition. How many times could you help someone for literal eternity before the acknowledgement that it’s futile hits, or the number of times you’ve had to put a loved one out of their misery pushes you over the edge?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like that, people's relationships would continue to develop and probably large frivolous events would happen everyday (aided by ample looting of champagne and cake) until maybe people have literally nothing else left to say to each other

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

So basically marriage? ;)

Yeah, relationships would begin and end as normal I’d expect. The only limitation to meeting new people is how far you can reasonably travel within the window.