this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
64 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60055 readers
2785 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, it's not the same.

Companies being acquired for their contracts is a daily occurrence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There's a difference between an order contract an a license.
The license to make Arm CPU was granted to Nuvia not to Qualcomm.

Qualcomm using the license, is the same as transferring or selling it, and that's NOT normal with a patent or copyright license. Except if it is kept within the intended scope.

Qualcomm taking over the license changes the scope, and that would usually be clearly enough to invalidate it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, there is not. A license is just a contract.

Buying a company because they have a license you want is not remotely unusual. It's perfectly standard behavior, and the entire enterprise world would fall apart if an acquisition lost the rights to licenses the purchased business owned.