Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55056 readers

135 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

I have tried I2P, here is my take. (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It is amazing, but it has the issue of not having that many user. I2P is great, but because not many people know about it and that it is harder to set-up than going to a torrent site and downloading, not many people use. I2P speed improve the more people use it. One other flow I found is that I2PSnark is awful and there is a need for a better client for it. From my understanding the more you seed, the better speeds you will get, thus it encourages seeding which solves the issue with normal torrent were a lot of people will not seed after a while. I think it is a great idea specially now that many torrent sites are being taken down.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I use XD. It’s still a web-based client but it’s much more smooth than I2PSnark. I also much prefer i2pd over the clumsy Java stuff of “default” i2p.

https://xd-torrent.github.io/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Never used I2P before because of slowness fear I got from Tor network and from the attempts I did and saw that awful Java client. But your approach made me interested again. Once connected there, how to reach content? Like downloading stuff and dig into what ot has to offer?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You can still use http://tracker2.postman.i2p or any other trackers on i2p (if they exist, it’s been awhile). You’ll just copy/paste the magnet links much like a traditional BitTorrent client.

I will say if you go this route, it does take quite some time to build enough tunnels for it to start working quickly. In other words, i2p feels much faster than Tor but not at first. I’d suggest browsing as many eepsites as you can just to get it going.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Tell ya what would be great, a follow up on this weddit post?

https://archive.is/1EXzu

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That client still does not support DHT via I2P correct? That's what their github page says

https://github.com/majestrate/XD

I haven't bothered trying it since it lacks DHT. For torrenting I2P with DHT I guess people are mainly going to use I2PSnark. (BiglyBT has limited support for I2P DHT but it is clunky and not very usable)

For torrenting I2P without DHT qBittorrent is working well, granted it is still quite new to the I2P scene.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I mean, that sure does suck but because most everyone is using the same tracker I don’t think it’s that big of an issue on i2p.