this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
25 points (72.7% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2728 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who gives a fuck. Norms are no longer a thing.

The news outlets can fuck off with their gasoline pouring.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Who gives a fuck. Norms are no longer a thing

And people are pissed about that...

A large number of people who didn't vote, chose not to because they view both parties as corrupt who prioritize the wealthy over regular citizens.

We can yell at them till we're blue in the face to choose the lesser of two evils because it's less evil, but that clearly isn't working.

So why not we meet the standards of Dem voters to earn their vote?

Why the fuck is it when that option is presented, everyone ignores it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A large number of people who didn’t vote, chose not to because they view both parties as corrupt who prioritize the wealthy over regular citizens.

Hope they're happy Trump is their new president. They effectively voted for him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What's your point?

We all lost.

We can be self righteous and quadruple down and run another unpopular moderate, and see if yelling at them to vote anyways works...

But it's got a pretty bad track record.

If we run a young charismatic candidate with a progressive platform, we know that performs very well.

So at a certain point. Aren't both sides acting like children?

Isn't the smart move for the "moderates" to compromise and we get progressive a little faster than they want? They're the ones controlling the party and exerting influence so their candidate wins in primaries over the one voters want.

Why is the compromise always to the right?

Why not do what works and gets the American people help faster?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

This is going to influence literally zero future votes. It's a flash in the pan news story for news junkies and not remotely as bad as past pardons, which themselves have also had zero impact on future voting. The broader impression of corruption is because of a systematic and continual deference to the issues of business and rich donors, not that a president's immediate family can get out of jail free.