this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
77 points (89.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5392 readers
149 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
77
AI predicts that most of the world will see temperatures rise to 3°C much faster than previously expected (phys.org)
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Three leading climate scientists have combined insights from 10 global climate models and, with the help of artificial intelligence (AI), conclude that regional warming thresholds are likely to be reached faster than previously estimated.

Mmmm faster then expected huh ?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not AI. It's an application of machine learning.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Machine learning is a field of artificial intelligence. AI is a very broad term, using the dictionary definition. It might not be what you consider AI of course.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ML has never been considered AI.

Marketing teams realized that LLMs let MLs sound like HAL from Space Odyssey and started calling it intelligent and using AI as a buzzword.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Even chess programs are in the field of artificial intelligence. That's what research into AI began with in the fifties. The term AI as defined by the dictionaries is ridiculously broad.

It's probably better to talk about an artificial mind if you mean real intelligence.