this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
695 points (94.3% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
1078 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Right, people are treating it as sports where you have to either cheer for one side or the other.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair one country was invaded by the other. It is entirely understandable to back the party that was invaded by the other nation especially when that nation has a recent history of imperialism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Last I checked, what actually happened was that Ukraine was plunged into a civil war after US ran a coup in 2104 that overthrew the democratically elected government.

Russia was invited into the conflict by LPR and DPR which it recognized independence of. This follows the precedent NATO set in Yugoslavia where it recognized breakaway regions and intervened on their behalf.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might want to edit the errors in your comment if you want people to take you seriously.

The LPT and DPR were legitimate why exactly? That's the part that makes the claim less than accurate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't need to edit anything, the LPR and DPR were every bit as legitimate as the regions that broke away from Yugoslavia. What exactly are you claiming is the difference between the two scenarios?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a bold claim to make given neither region were their own nation or were historically Russian or Ukrainian.

Yugoslavia was formed if multiple countries untied by socialism. The LPR and DPR as breakaway units are not the sane and seem to have been very heavily influenced by Russia. That's the same imperialistic Russia that keeps invading foreign lands to seize them since Putin was elected.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My issue with hexbearians was that in every single thread I saw them in they would do nothing but whatabout regardless of the context. I understand they may have good points about certain things and to their credit some had very well written and informative comments but most of the time they weren't directly relevant to the topic. It could be a loud minority but it doesn't change the fact it's annoying to see huge threads of whatabout arguments all the time by them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

getting called out for your bullshit on any topic pertains to the discussion, we've had problems with all crowds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In my view, having consistent moral standards is a prerequisite for having an honest discussion on any topic. If anything, the actual whataboutism is pointing fingers at other countries while refusing to acknowledge what your own country is doing. People should focus on fixing problems at home and holding their own governments accountable first and foremost because that's where they have most agency.

This is what people who you accuse of whataboutism point out. Focusing on countries you don't like and talking about how bad they are when your own country does the same things simply serves to deflect attention and to create the impression that your own society is somehow better and more enlightened. This is how the west often justifies the atrocities it commits.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"whataboutism" does not mean "you're never allowed to point out a double standard"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You know whataboutism isn't an actual logical fallacy and was originally used in defense of British colonialism "well the IRA also does bad things" right?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, my point was that people should focus on themselves and what their countries are doing. Your "well the IRA also does bad things" is precisely the kind of deflection I'm arguing against.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm replying to the person you're replying to.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is really a non-sequitur but I have zero idea how people choose to upvote it downvote anymore. You and I were in agreement and somehow I got upvoted and you got downvoted? I don't get it