this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
941 points (98.8% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
3200 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
941
Shiny (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

"Hey look at this cool rock i found" is definitely a valid courting technique for neurodiverse persons :3

but USUALLY never diamonds.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

That's because diamonds are pretty boring. The only thing they have going for them is sparkling. There are SO many prettier gemstones out there.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

Hard disagree: they exhibit 4 perfect octahedral cleavage planes in addition to their adamantine lustre, diamond is one of the most useful materials in existence, and their petrological origins speak to incredibly interesting conditions of formation! In fact, a mineral inclusion within a diamond gave us our first solid evidence of the existence of water at equilibrium with mantle rock at depth on Earth, which was previously largely discounted.

But yeah, fuck De Beers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Is it bad to link to [email protected] when we are already on [email protected] ?

load more comments (7 replies)