this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023

370 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59424 readers

3747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

370

Google app being flagged as a virus by Huawei phones (stackdiary.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm seeing a lot of reports from users of Huawei and Honor devices have reported that their phones are incorrectly identifying Google apps as Trojan malware, specifically labeled as TrojanSMS-PA. According to the alert, this "malicious software" has the ability to send SMS messages without user consent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So you are saying that Huawei is better than Google, because Huawei has less suspicion about it than the US government, because we should not conflate a company from a country with the government og that country?

While you are conflating Google and the US government without even so much as acknowledging that?

If we are being fair, we must accept both the USA and China have the means to get data out of their companies, and have done so frequently. If we thus compare either Google and Huawei or USA and China, in both cases we can make out the shinier turd of the two clearly.

Now can we go back to hating both of them please?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly this. I am no fan of Google, but it's the devil I know.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Better the devil sitting right next to you than the devil that is far away in a different country?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tankies gonna tank.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

And they occasionally need to be debated anyway.
Like with conspiracies and religious cults, not debating them allows them to pull people in, while debating them both gives those vulnerable the ability to see the issues with them, and it allows those already believing a pathway to exit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Anarkiddies gonna anarkiddy.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

conflate a company from a country with the government of that country

It's actually okay to do this for China, because just about every private enterprise has a CCP cell now. It's important to understand how state capitalism works with the CCP and China.

[+] [email protected] -27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm saying that the only hate for Huawei comes from the US government. Who constantly lies. So using their lies to form an opinion on Huawei is idiotic.. I didn't actually bring google into this at all.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have seen plenty of independent hate, and my hown hate has certainly developed independently too.
Even in politics other countries have come to the same conclusion, some of which even against US influence, while certainly others where pulled along by them.

Also did you notice that you jsut assumed I was completely influenced by the US, as in that you hold the innate belief that everyone who disagrees on this must obviously be doing so because they fell victim to their propaganda?

I didn’t actually bring google into this at all.

I’d trust a Huawei phone less than I would a Google phone. Much less.

[your comment]

[+] [email protected] -22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah a lot of people are influenced by US propaganda. That shouldn't be surprising. However, let's look at what experts in other countries that are not America say.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-huawei-europe-britain/britain-managing-huawei-risks-has-no-evidence-of-spying-official-idUSKCN1Q91PM

https://phys.org/news/2018-12-evidence-huawei-spying-german-watchdog.html

But those voices are drowned out because, well US propaganda is very powerful. So much so that yeah, it influences individuals.

*Edit: And yes, US propaganda is so powerful it goes well beyond it's borders affecting individuals in other nations as well. I'm not asking you to believe me, I'm asking you to question where you got those opinions from.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

First of, your articles are about telco hardware, not smartphones software.

The german case basically boils down to Germany wanting independence in their critical infrastructure. At least officially this is so China can't affect them by for example stopping exports of repair components. Basically your source is clickbait but without the release. »German governments information security branch says no evidence of Huawei spying ... they say the boycott happened because of strategic resource independence in networking technology«

The space of classical newspaper articles is not in a good state, basically it's almost entirely propagandized to death. So you need to know your sources, please don't be the one throwing around a phys.org article on politics like it's credible information.

source on the Germany thing

I could clear up this case because I happen to know that "die Zeit" (German for "the Time") is one of the few remaining relatively independent sources for stuff relating to Germany (they are biased to follow German politics in coverage but not content, currently). I also track them closely for any changes to that status, basically if they fall to anyones propaganda, the first ones to bring that to light and point it out will be the opposing propaganda. Here is their article, for your translators pleasure:
https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2023-03/5g-ausbau-bundesregierung-verbot-huawei

⁤
your source kinda goes into that direction at the end at least

But some observers raised eyebrows at the BSI's apparent dismissal of cyber security risks concerning Huawei.

"I believe it's wrong to suggest that the concerns about Chinese espionage are unfounded and easy to detect," telecom security expert Ronja Kniep told AFP.

"Even if Huawei has no official relationship with the Chinese government, that doesn't mean Chinese services aren't using the company and its technology as vehicles for espionage."

All three of Germany's main mobile network operators use infrastructure provided by Huawei, Spiegel pointed out.

So apparently the opinion of "the BSI" here is wildly out of line with Germany's government's general opinion at the time.

but wait there's more

So apparently in Germany there is this "BSI-gate" of sorts, around the incompetence and potential Russian and Chinese relations of "Germany's Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), Arne Schoenbohm" (as he is quoted in your source).
So either way this person was extremely untrustworthy in this matter here.

⁤

So now to the other source. Reuters is at least well known, and the article has an author, so that's nice.

I looked into the matter somewhat. Around the same date as your article, the BBC wrote

To monitor the company, the UK set up the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre, which comes under the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).

In March 2019, it said it hadn't found evidence of malicious Chinese state activity, but it did identify some serious defects in Huawei's software engineering and cyber-security competence.

Seems they harshened their stance after US influence around 2020 to me too, but it's not like they where entirely unsuspicious before that influence either.

[+] [email protected] -11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right so no evidence, just suspicion from the US was enough for them to harden their stance.

Your "rebuttals" doesn't change any facts on the ground.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you not listen? I started with saying that your evidence wasn't relevant to the matter at hand. This is about smartphones, not telco equipment.

Then I partially agreed with you on the uk case, and explained why your source on the german case was utter trash, and wrong.

There are no relevant facts for your original point on the ground, you didn't bring any and I showed why. You spent your time moving goalposts and bringing up new unrelated issues.

The current state of the discussion is:

the uk may have been influenced by the us to be harsher on huawei than need be
both germany and the uk had and have consensus on some suspicions against huawei
the suspicions in the uk where present before and got amplified after us action
those suspicions are multi-factored, some of which apply to us as individuals and some do not

Your original claim was:
Huawei is better than Google, fear of Huawei is solely cause by propaganda.

No arguments have been made yet, the discussion has gone nowhere because I was stuck refuting your side-projects.

If you wanna look at actual facts, see for example this comment I made to someone elses .
There I go into some issues with Huawei itself, and the relations of it to the chinese government, as well as indications that they are trying to hide those for image reasons. That is a fact-based source that the relations are real, that they are creating propaganda to hide that, and why they would do that. If you are looking for facts go look at that.

I do not refute that the US is propagandizing against Huawei, and that they are influencing other governments to follow their decisions against Huawei, and thus their media influence to be directed to defending that and propagandizing against Huawei too.
I agree that this is happening, and I highly dislike it.

Just because a side is using propaganda, doesn't mean they are wrong. Being careful we can filter out some facts, then filter those for what is relevant to us as consumers. And we end up with the result that Huawei smartphones are a privacy nightmare, basically any consumer tech with their software and internet access is, and should be avoided. Components and hardware by them is probably fine for now, so if are going to replace their software, or are gonna sandbox their devices, then to a consumer I see no reason not to buy from them (as opposed to governments, where there are valid reasons not to).

To summarize:

you can (should) be against Huawei based on facts alone
governments can ban Huawei for valid reasons
your sources and reading comprehension suck

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's because the accusations and bans were on telco equipment. Hell, you can still buy Huawei phones on Amazon if you wanted to in the states. You don't seem to understand what all the propaganda hub bub was about to begin with.

*Edit:

I think you're completely misunderstanding my position. My position is Huawei is considered worse than google because of US propaganda. Not that Huawei is better than google. And that propaganda is not substantiated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure that Huawei is considered worse because of US propaganda for everyone, or even most, but I can accept some.
I know a few people that certainly had their issues with them before I ever saw them even mentioned in the general media or online, before the propaganda we se now started.

In any case, if you say "that propaganda is not substantiated", then can you please elaborate what specific claims where made and are wrong? Because as propaganda does they use everything negative about something and then make up some more, so if it's all unsubstantiated wouldn't that mean Huawei is absolute good and has never done anything even slightly bad?

My claims are that:

Huawei collects users private information, that they have no business and no reason collecting
if the CCP asks, Huawei will comply
- in handing over user data
- in not shipping or threatening to not ship components for infrastructure for geopolitical reasons (the thing most countries claiming as their reason to ban Huawei from their infrastructure)
Huawei is not worker owned, though they claim to be (this ones new after the other discussion I linked above)

⁤
Some of my reasons for believing this are in this comment I linked above.

Outline your claims, or refute evidence for mine, or add evidence against mine

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think we have differing opinions actually. I'm saying there have been many countries that have stated they do not see the stuff USA talks about to make it reasonable to ban. They all shut up and followed the US after 2020 and individuals even started to say Huawei is more evil than American companies. Again without any particular evidence.

Would I argue that Google and Huawei do similar and equally bad things, yes absolutely. I'm just tired of people attacking Huawei and saying they're worse than American corps. That's all I'm trying to say here.