this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
764 points (98.7% liked)

memes

10170 readers
2608 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Take any tech bro take on transit, and if you try to perfect it, you'll almost always end up with a train.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

What about the moon? Surely not...

Well, ultimately space elevators are the most energy efficient way to escape Earth's gravity well. And once we have one of those, mind as well build a mass driver at the top so rockets don't have to carry so much of their own mass. Then we can build a laser-based photonic sail on the other end to decelerate the cars and make them even lighter/faster, and then build track at the bottom...

Train.

What about interstellar travel?

Well, ultimately wormholes are way more efficient than any subluminal travel once the infrastructure to build them is in place: https://www.orionsarm.com/eg-article/48545a0f6352a

So we control traffic on each side carefully. In fact, we could just suspend a really strong wire on either end...

Yep. Train.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What about those giant quadcopter type things they keep wanting to build to fly from building rooftops in cities for some reason?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Within cities?

Look, aircraft are Hella noisy and if stuff goes bad, they'll smash into buildings. Using them for intra-urban transit is not safe. Besides, I don't know if multicopters can autorotate, which only adds to the safety concerns.

So why not bring it slightly closer to the ground. Maybe put the transportation device on a bridge or viaduct. And while you could put some stairs up from the streets, you may even choose to link buildings into them directly. Most tall buildings have lifts, after all.

Next, giving each building its own link into the system would be excessive. You can achieve 90 percent of the utility if you have larger entry hubs for multiple buildings, and expect people to walk the last mile.

Anyway, back to the vehicle, since a vehicle for a handful of people is rather inefficient, why not build the vehicles for many dozens of people? Why not build it to connect multiple vehicles? If you run, like, four of these, every five minutes, most people will be able to walk up any time and just go.

And to make that movement more efficient, let's have our vehicles roll along a specifically designed path, optimised for minimal friction by using hard wheels on a hard surface.

There, I replaced the quadcopters with a train.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Oh I mean you can replace them, but when nothing of the original system remains you're not so much optimizing the idea as throwing it out to use trains instead

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If they really want rooftop travel, a gondola system could probably work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Works assuming the rooftops are roughly in line of sight. That is something I assumed not to be definitively true in the other comment..