this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
368 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2278 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A 15-year-old boy was sentenced to life in prison for fatally stabbing a stranger, Muhammad Hassam Ali, after a brief conversation in Birmingham city center. The second boy, who stood by, was sentenced to five years in secure accommodation. Ali’s family expressed their grief, describing him as a budding engineer whose life was tragically cut short.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It should not be legal to hand out life sentences to minors, period.

In Germany the maximum sentence for minors is 10 years and depending on your developmental state you can count as a minor until you are 21 (You are always treated as one if you are under 18). And that is how it should be. Locking people up for life helps nobody.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This isn't a whole life sentence but 13 years and then parole for the rest of his life.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When I was 15, I knew it was wrong to stab people. It's not like getting into a fight on the playground. When you bring out a knife, or any deadly weapon, you immediately escalate things way beyond what school administration can handle.

As a kid, I knew there were crimes I could do that were just "boys being boys." Smoking weed, petty theft, vandalism, even getting into fist-fights. I also knew there were crimes that were off limits, such as rape and murder. Just about everyone around me knew the same thing, too.

You're advocating for a culture that encourages kids to commit more crimes and more serious crimes than they otherwise would because they know they will get off easy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s very obvious from your posts that you neither know what the purpose of a punishment in a legal state is, nor what the effects of them are.

The idea that a multi year sentence is “getting of easy” is insane. And from what you are writing I get very strong vibes that you are one of those people who still subscribe to debunked ideas of perpetrator types, which are unironically Nazi-ideology.

The world that you want to create is not a safer one, quite the opposite in fact. Rehabilitation is the by far most important aspect of a punishment and the idea that crimes like the one in question are committed by people who carefully weigh how many years they are willing to spend in prison and could thus be deterred is beyond ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Regardless of the veracity of your argument, it is not helpful to denigrate someone you are conversing with. Please just work with the information you have in the context of the discussion. There's no need to make such insinuations to establish your point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nor is it helpful to cast Godwin so early........

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I have no idea what that means

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

If you don’t want people to point out that you are spreading Nazi-ideology, than maybe don’t spread Nazi-Ideology

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Your prescription seems to assume that either:

  1. Everyone can be rehabilitated, which no society has ever achieved.

  2. That it's preferable to push a well understood risk to people's lives back into the community than it is to keep that risk in the care of the state where they can't kill more people.

...but you strike me as too sensible to prescribe that kind of thing, so what have I missed?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

“Western” countries don’t have a way to deal with the handful of truly irredeemable criminals. They will not and cannot be members of society ever.

But what do we do with them? Lock them up forever? Kill them? Nobody knows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

I think it's pretty straightforwardly reasonable to say that we should above all else, remove their ability to continue to do harm. There's going to be a range of views on exactly what that should look like - mostly based on your view of how punitive we should be. Options would include confinement, exile, medication, lobotomy, and execution.

Personally, I think ending someone through death, lobotomy, and the like is unnecessarily barbaric. Confinement in one form or another seems like the most reasonable option, and I think consentual alternatives are debatable.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lots of/most/almost all prisoners are rehabilitated though?

We only hear about the very small minority that make attention grabbing headlines.

I'm in Europe BTW.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not really. Look up the life of car thiefs. Most gain inside knowledge after leaving prison with fresh connections.

Prisons are almost like a networking opportunity. Mark Cann made an interesting video about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are you arguing for or against mass incarceration?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I'm too stupid to have the right answer. I can just make noise and hope someone smarter comes up with better solutions.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago

Fuck em.

The victim got a life sentence. They're gone. I'd be fine with him being executed. There's ZERO remorse over filth like this. 15 is developed enough to know they literally killed someone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Locking them up helps all the other people they won't have the opportunity to hurt or kill

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Locking you (and everyone making similar comments here) up would also help all the people that you won’t have the opportunity to hurt or kill. Because how can I know that you won’t ever commit a crime like that?

The idea that you can get security by simply locking everyone up who commits a crime is delusional and for the outcomes you only need to check the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We just need the technology from minority report.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The crazy thing about minority report is that nobody, least of all the people who made it, seem to have understood the problem that the movie depicted:

Having the ability to predict attempted killings and interfere with them would be a genuinely good thing! The problem was the notion that everybody who is predicted to commit such a crime gets an extreme punishment without even a trial, consideration of the circumstances, or any of the other things we would normally attempt to do if we learned about someone attempting to commit a crime. Equating premediated murder out of greed with an over-reacting in a highly surprising situation, with self-defense, with pretty much just accidents and punishing them all in the most cruel way you can imagine is what was so idiotic about the movie that it was hard to take seriously. Trials are there for a reason, and that reason isn’t just to figure out what happened physically!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

If only our past behavior could give you some insight into the kind of people we are and how we can be expected to behave in the future. But given the complete absence of data I guess that's just impossible. Oh well.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago

Why the fuck should he get a second chans on life when his victime never will ? If it where my son who where dead I wouldn't settle for anything else.