this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
218 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59292 readers
3836 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
218
YouTube under no obligation to host anti-vaccine advocate’s videos, court says (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

YouTube under no obligation to host anti-vaccine advocate’s videos, court says::YouTube had the discretion to take down content that harmed users, judge said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Mercola had tried to argue that YouTube owed him more than $75,000 in damages for breaching its own user contract and denying him access to his videos.

Over time, Mercola amassed 300,000 subscribers to a YouTube channel that "garnered 50 million views" by boosting professionally made videos that linked to his website, "which promotes natural health and provides health articles, optimal wellness products, medical news, and a free newsletter."

Mercola claimed that he first became aware that YouTube was planning to ban his channel when The Washington Post published an article about it.

In his complaint, he said that within six minutes of the Post's article publishing, he got a message that his channels were banned, effective immediately, for violating YouTube's new policy on vaccine misinformation.

Beeler rejected all these arguments, agreeing with YouTube that there was no breach of contract, no damages should be awarded, and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act barred Mercola's claims.

Commenting on Mercola's case, legal expert Eric Goldman wrote: "Lawsuits over content removals never succeed."

The original article contains 676 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] doctorn 1 points 1 year ago

Wow, is this a ChatGPT bot that summarizes long articles? (Rethorical question 😅)

That's actually so cool and useful! 😁

Kudo's to this idea!