this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
546 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

59187 readers
2004 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is ridiclous

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The design forces the user to use it wirelessly. Apple just wants their products to look better, meaning NO CORDS EVER. It's entirely about aesthetic.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

They should have just released a mouse pad that can charge the mouse wirelessly then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I think Sun made mice that didn't work without their metallic mouse pad, that had some sort of grid on it.

Apple's problem is in following:

There are industrial designers, fashion designers, managers and engineers.

Apple doesn't have industrial designers. Only fashion designers pretending.

In a normal company managers consult designers and engineers back and forth, both figuring out some compromise and also asking the other group whether there is a better way.

Not in Apple. Their designers are clearly superior hierarchically to engineers.

And in the end their products are of inferior quality (for that price).

Apple's idea of how things should look and work, when expressed in words, is absolutely fine! It's actually wonderful. And perfectly possible, it's actually the same goal as with industrial ergonomics.

Except they don't have the process they need to fulfill that. They only have the PR to pretend.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

If I worked at Apple, I’d hire you right here, right now.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

im surprised they haven’t done this tbh

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Apparently Logitech does have this out now, so I wonder if they patented the "concept" and it will be another 20 years before anyone can do it. Assuming that someone else didn't already do it 20 years ago and that patented already ran out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ive seen one at least 10 years ago already. But that didn't exactly charge the mouse, instead the mouse relied on always being on the pad to work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's not true. It charges very slowly, about 12 hours to charge a completely dead battery, but it does charge

The bigger problem is that it's expensive af, and since current gen Logitech mice have months of battery life and charge in an hour with the usb cord it's really pointless.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Their trackpad can and does work via USB so ???

I have one of their trackpads and it works great with Ubuntu over USB but not over Bluetooth for some reason. (It connects, but Ubuntu doesn’t handle it well.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s literally just the same body as the OG Magic Mouse, which had a bay for a pair of AAs underneath. All they did was remove the bay, put a rechargeable battery in there, and a socket to charge it. It takes a couple of minutes to give it 9 hours of juice.

There’s no grand conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I've said too much they're coming for me they know they know they know

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

If that’s the case, then why does the wireless keyboard have the port on the back?