Technology

59424 readers

2921 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

357

The Fennec Android browser is currently behind on Firefox security updates, deemed unsafe by F-droid (leminal.space)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If, like me, you've relied on Fennec as a more tolerable version of Firefox for Android, you may have gotten some bad news in the latest F-droid update cycle.

Fennec has fallen so far behind on updates that serious security patches implemented by Mozilla in Firefox haven't been applied to the fork, and Fennec is therefore still breachable.

The developer responded two weeks ago that they were "short on time", and there still isn't a new, secure version available. This appears to be due to that recurring weak link in open source development: small teams, confronted by real life demands like time and money?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

For those who want to install standard FF via Obtainium use this:

https://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/fenix/releases/

Then add intermediate links (EDIT: this will only fetch releases like 130.0 or 130.1, etc. so feel free to edit regex if you want to match other versions like 130.0.1)

[0-9]+\.[0-9]+/$

android/$

fenix-[0-9]+\.[0-9]+-android-arm64-v8a/$

EDIT: based on https://github.com/ImranR98/Obtainium/issues/1625#issuecomment-2120736614