Asklemmy

43714 readers

1779 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

109

What word or term annonys you? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

381 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Please don't think I'm here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is 'eeeh' before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I've been pavloved bc it's always used by someone disagreeing. But I'm happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the 'eeeh' or 'erm' that annoys me.

So what's a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying "eeeh actually 'eeh' is a perfectly fine term" would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I've said all this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I'm open to an explanation of a commonplace situation where it's necessary to have a separate word for "is of the gender that matches that assigned at birth."

Any time that you assume something is some vague obvious-to-you "normal" by default and insist that everyone else that isn't that "normal" requires a distinct identifier.

You sound like a typical boomer that describes the ethnicity of anyone except those the boomer otherwise sees as "normal." us-foreign-policy

To me it's like if I say I enjoyed the sunrise" and someone says, "you mean the Earth sunrise?"

You don't live light years away from trans people.

a human is likely to be talking about is the one we experience on Earth.

Do you not see the tiny bubble world you're perceiving everyone else from when you presume "a human" by default is only perceiving your tiny bubble world and otherwise doesn't count?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago

but in general the default "sunrise" a human is likely to be talking about is the one we experience on Earth.

In this example they, the CIS are human, and the non-cis is implied to be what? Non-human? This person sucks.