this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
436 points (99.1% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5639 readers
527 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's Liberal (Democrat) vs. Republican, ofc - b/c EVERY SINGLE THING MUST BE POLITICAL THESE DAYS!!!!, ofc:-P

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You joke, but there is disagreement about making feminine hygiene products free of charge to help poor girls be able to attend school and other activities.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I only half-joke b/c to some people, literally everything indeed MUST be political. Like whether a woman should have the same basic human rights as a man, especially if she chooses not to have kids - and let's say enjoys cats or dogs instead.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only debate more divisive than a political one is the cat vs dog debate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Nuh-uh, b/c catz rule while dogz drule!

Oh ah... ahem, I mean yes, quite possibly you may be correct my good sir and/or madam.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

I heard the argument was that boys should not see these hygiene products or else they might have a temptation to become girls and they won't have willpower to resist it. This will result in a shortage of military deployed in the middle east by 2035

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

it's unbelievable that anyone would oppose this

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a slippery slope. If we agree to fund free "feminine hygiene products" on public toilets, next thing you know, the liberals will want to add "toilet paper", "plumbing" and "door locks" to the list.
Meanwhile over here in the conservative American heartland, we're fine just shitting in a hole, and there's nothing wrong with that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

it’s unbelievable that anyone SANE would oppose this

There, ftfy:-|