Asklemmy

43907 readers

1066 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Browsing "All" and images of nsfw-nature (discuss.tchncs.de)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

what are your thoughts on browsing the "All" feed ? especially your thoughts on what should be marked nsfw and what should not

I have a lot of thoughts about this, but I am curious about how other users feel :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think "nsfw" in itself is a good description - "not safe for work". I would be embarrassed or reprimanded at work if I scrolled past pictures of gore, extreme violence, nudity, or sexually suggestive anime girls, so those should be marked nsfw.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

There are two problems with that: First, what is acceptable or not is a cultural thing and varies from country to country. There are actually countries where anything depicting humans or mentioning women is NSFW. In other countries they wonder "why has this been marked NSFW? They don't even f_ck!".

Second, even with atking this into account, and if we concentrate on an American and European context which has mostly comparable ideas of morality, people still mark things as NSFW where I ask "Why?", and other posts are not marked NSFW where I also ask "Why?" - if you understand what I mean.

So any usage of an NSFW tag has a certain ambuguity to it, and can only seen as a hint, as a personal thing to use or not use as the poster evaluates it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

Well, they could expand tags beyond simply NSFW. A clear example would be "nudity" vs something like "violence", but could be more specific like "nudity" vs "sexual" or "pornographic"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

I'd imagine that images of nude people in sexually suggestive positions are not safe for work in most jobs in most countries...