this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1122 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5390 readers
1252 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1122
The value of x (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
139 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The internal angles of a triangle always add up to 180⁰, therefore the one pixel offset is irrelevant because the unlabelled angle is, despite what the image suggests, ~~60~~ 80⁰.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Assuming you're talking about the triangle on the left, it's 80⁰: 180 - 60 - 40 = 80. The other two unlabeled angles are 100⁰ and 45⁰ respectively. None of the unlabelled angles are 60⁰.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The shape on the left might be a quadrilateral instead of a triangle, with a vertex at the same place as the top vertex of the shape on the right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yes I meant 80 lol, thanks

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It's enough to say it's "CLEARLY" not 90⁰.