this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
382 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

CBS News, hosting vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz for the general election campaign’s third debate next week, says it will be up to the politicians — not the moderators — to check the facts of their opponents.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

No holds barred free for all. I like it. This is going to be an amazing debate. Midwest against I have no idea what the hell Vance is.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

what the hell Vance is

A couch-fucking weirdo, from what I've heard.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Well there's no way to fact check this so i guess it'll have to stand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I've been seeing a lot of people saying he also has syphilis. Must be true because I want it to be.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"No holds barred" is still an honest fight.

"No facts checked" favors the opponent who has no real principles or policy to defend. It's like walking in the ring shotgun and the refs being like okay y'all on your own.

It's gonna be an absolute shit show and basically be a demonstration on how well can a liar Vance lie without being too obvious about being a liar. Best we can hope is that Walz will make it very obvious.

Hopefully there will be a second or 2 to slip in something of more substance while we wipe the shit off our faces.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Here is how you win. Prepare for lies. Do a quick fact check during each round and then punch him in the face with the truth. Laugh at him regularly for being a lying clown. Treat Vance with no respect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also mention couches every 2 min

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ha ha ha yes!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Vance and Trump keep making the same lies even after they're debunked, so Walz could make a bingo card ahead of time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Midwest against I have no idea what the hell Vance is.

Ohio is also considered the Midwest.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Eh, only really to people in Ohio and not in the Midwest.

Or maybe that's just my upper Midwestern heritage coming through. To us, it may as well be Pennsylvania, and nobody calls that the Midwest.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Minnesota here - in no way is Ohio in the Midwest.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Midwestern here.

I think the fact that EVERY Midwesterner mutually shits on Ohio at any opportunity kiiiiinda makes a case that they're Midwest also.

There are other states MORE deserving of the shit-talk, but it's not personal and visceral the way every other Midwestern state hates Ohio.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not shitting on them - Ohio is simply too far east to be in the Midwest.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ohio is the eastern border of the Midwest, as defined by the Census Bureau.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's round on the sides and hi in the middle. Oh hi oh hio.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

it is according to census bureau definition.