this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
927 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59424 readers
2838 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Have you played Pokémon and PalWorld? One is a pit-fighter-trainer where the other is a base-builder. Or does the capturing of creatures and the similar art style make them too much alike?

In a truly competitive capitalist market there should be room enough for both. But Nintendo wants their players to be obligated to own only Nintendo approved products.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you? The monster designs, some of them are straight up copycats and pallette swaps and such. Others are basically that "ok copy my homework, but don't make it identical so we don't get in trouble.". It is absolutely pushing the limits. To say you do not see that is willful. It has to be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So Nintendo is suing them over the monster design similarities? I thought it was a patent suit, not copyright.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whatever. I can talk about whatever I want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, but I'm curious what Nintendo is talking to the courts about, or if this is merely a weaponization of litigation.