this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
367 points (99.2% liked)

People Twitter

4978 readers
2686 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (4 children)

a yes, it's going to be so fun when enshittification hits the power plant and it start leaking radioactive water in the lake

Edit: my issue is with tech companies owning power plants, be it nuclear, oil or gas, enshittification cold fuck all of them and cause catastrophic damage, other than that nuclear power is based

[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Safest power source per kWh. This is some boomer-ass scare mongering.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't fear nuclear power, i fear tech companies especially those public

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Are you under the impression Microsoft will be running it themselves? I don't get it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

The power being used to train AI models = an AI is who's going to run the power plant.

I guess??

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Is the problem nuclear? Or the problem the fact that Microsoft AI bullshit needs a full ass nuclear power plant to run it?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Read the comment I replied to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, sorry, those were rhetorical questions. I apologize, you're 100% correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ahh gochya.

I mean, I get why people scoff at it. But look at it from their perspective.

They're getting heat for all the energy LLMs use. The natural response is to buy carbon free energy and good on them for taking that step, frankly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If they've got to to it... this is probably the better than most ways they could be doing it I suppose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 21 hours ago

I'm usually on the lookout for carbon offsets when companies "pledge" to reduce carbon but those are bullshit.

This though? Pretty kick ass.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

They could just burn coal/oil/natural gas instead and for sure poison everything that way. Nuclear has a fighting chance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

As opposed to all the other non renewable sources of power cause cancer to those who live near by

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Don't give power plants to tech companies period lol, at least software can't fuck as many people and the environment as an oil or radioactive leak could