Selfhosted

39254 readers

195 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Proxying torrent traffic to homeserver (feddit.it)

submitted 20 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm setting up a self-hosted stack with a bunch of services running on a home device. I'm also tunneling all the traffic through a VPS in order to expose the services without exposing my home IP or opening ports on my local network. Currently all my traffic is HTTP, and its path looks like this:

Caddy proxy on remote VPS (HTTPS, :80 & :443)
Wireguard tunnel
Caddy proxy in Docker on homeserver (HTTP, :80)
app containers in separate isolated subnets, shared with Caddy

I want to set up qBittorrent and other torrent apps, and I want all their traffic to pass through the proxies. Proxying traffic to the WebUI is easy, there's plenty of tutorials; what I'm struggling with is proxying the torrent leeching and seeding traffic, which is the most important part since I live in a country that's not cool with piracy.

Unless I'm misunderstanding, BitTorrent traffic is TCP or UDP, so I'd need Caddy to act as a Layer 4 proxy. There's a community-maintained plugin that should support this. How would I configure it though? Do I need both instances to listen on a new port? Or can I open a new port on the VPS only, and forward traffic to the homeserver Caddy over the same port as the HTTP traffic (:80)? Are there nuances in proxying TCP traffic that I should be aware of?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I already have that set up with Wireguard, what I'm figuring out is how to route traffic through it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

A) Set up a wiregard VPN server in your remote instance. Or better, get a VPN provider, the VPS is kinda pointless.

B) Assuming you're using docker as you should to run your home server's service, use gluetun to connect to the VPN and route your docker traffic for the instances through gluetun. This will ensure that you have a dead man switch when/if the VPN goes down.

C) set-up a reverse proxy to access the various instance from the outside if that is something you need.

Here's a fully developed config, you can use a jumping point.

https://github.com/geekau/mediastack

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I have already set up all of that. My setup is similar to the one in this blogpost and it's already working for various apps that only use HTTP. What I'm trying to do is to also route BitTorrent traffic (TCP/UDP) over the same setup without opening up entirely new paths.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Usually that's done by the network routing. Add a default(?) route(?) or make the software bind to the vpn interface. I'm not sure. I think firewall rules can do the same thing. If you're using docker, I'd advise you to use "gluetun" that seems to do everything for you.

Usually people do copyright violation with bittorrent. That means they tend to make sure the routing or dns doesn't leak anything. I think that's usually done by running the software inside of some containers or virtualization. If you do that your setup becomes simpler than inventing a dozen or so firewall rules. Either use gluetun or make the container bind to the vpn in its entirety. So practically the same setup everyone uses for pirating, just that you don't pay for a VPN service, but do that (server) part yourself on your virtual server. Everything else is a good bit more elaborate and complicated...