this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
59 points (92.8% liked)

Firefox

17602 readers
597 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter” would you be confused why they didn’t move a rack into your house?

My question is why are you projecting your limited interpretation as a global truth?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In IT context local is a well establised term. It's either hosted locally, i. e. on machine running the browser or not. A datacenter or cloud are remote machines also by the same well established definition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ok, now do your own datacenter vs cloud.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The language is confusing, and Mozilla should fix it themselves.

The important takeaway is: data is sent over an IP address controlled by Google, to a remote server, running Google software. No processing is taking place on someone's local computer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

IP address can belong to Mozilla, but the rest is correct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Hadn't checked, that is not a hard requirement for the platform - assuming they actually have it in their infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter”

Then that would also be an oxymoron.

Local is the opposite of remote. This is a remote server. Remote servers are not local. This is not a matter of interpretation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

It is, actually. It is local to them, it is remote to you. They are differentiating from a remote server in someone else’s datacenter. It is not that confusing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

This is a FAQ for end users, about a feature in software running on end users' computers.

It is absolutely doublespeak to call it "local". Are we supposed to invent an entirely new term now to distinguish between remote and local? Please do not accept this usage. It will make meaningful communication much harder.

Edit: I mean seriously, by this token OpenAI, Google, Facebook, etc. could call their servers "locally hosted". It is an utterly meaningless term if you accept this usage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 50 minutes ago

We actually do have better terminology for "local to Mozilla" and "remote to Mozilla"... It's first party and third party.

And, from the looks of it, Mozilla is indeed using Google Cloud Services as a third party, according to their privacy policy.