Science Memes

11047 readers

4004 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1075

biodegradable (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

73 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Sheep intestine condoms ftw!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This, but un-sarcastically.

Would be an interesting boost to the Sheep industry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

aren't sheep about as bad as cows for the climate?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't think so. But I think that that's going to vary a lot based on how you want to measure "badness for the climate".

My instinct is to look at Feed to Gain Ratio, which is the measure of food eaten to weight gained. This will vary animal to animal based on the animal's purpose (meat cows vs dairy cows, meat lambs vs wool sheep, etc) and the type of food they're fed.

Still, there are reliable bands for estimating for each animal. According to This Article, it looks like sheep can fall into a 4:1 to 6:1 ratio while cows are closer to 12:1 (this is a bit higher than I was taught in high school biology, but not by much). Of course, the higher these numbers, the "worse" the animal is for the environment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They might have been asking about methane production, that's a big topic for cattle because it's a very potent greenhouse gas and having a lot of cattle produces a lot of methane - and it's a byproduct of how their digestive systems work and all ruminants, sheep included, have that problem to some degree.

I wasn't able to find a definitive answer, but per animal sheep aren't as bad, but it's due to their smaller size and if western countries kept eating the same amount of meat but ate more sheep (due to it being cheaper from the demand for sheep condoms, lol) instead of beef I'm not sure it would be better. (Replacing chicken with sheep would definitely be worse though.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

So what I'm hearing is that we just need to selectively breed people to have smaller penises so we can just use chicken intestines for condoms instead?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

About as bad as any of the animals that can eat grass, wild or farmed

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Classic supporter of the Sheep-Sex-industrial complex... But not the Welsh kind.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As long as it’s not still in the sheep.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I see you're unaware of what goes on in New Zealand...

With love from across the Tasman 😁

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

They're not as good at preventing STDs, but they're decent at preventing pregnancy.