this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
1643 points (95.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5837 readers
1495 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

We used to have earbuds that don't need to be charged because they had a headphone jack, didn't get lost so easily because they had a cord attached to a headphone jack, never lost the bluetooth connection because they had a headphone jack, and they cost less because they had a headphone jack. https://bsky.app/profile/daisyfm.bsky.social/post/3l3mfjc6sn62k

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But like... Clearly there's something we're doing differently here.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pocket? Idk, it seems natural to me that moving around with a device in your pocket, plugged into a pair of headphones would cause bending and twisting of the cord, which would wear it out over time.

And lots of other stresses, like accidentally getting them caught on something and yanking them out of your ears, wrapping them up to put away in a bag/pocket, etc. It's no wonder I wore out so many pairs.

OTOH, the only wired listening device I own now is a headset that I wear at my desk, which I expect to last forever because it's subject to none of those stresses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Guess I've just been lucky. I assume some people might also pull out the cable at the cord instead of at the base, I've seen that happening with charging cables sometimes.

At the moment I also have to use a little C to 3.5mm adapter and could maybe see that taking some damage but so far so good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I could see the (USB-?)C adapter taking the worst of the wear-and-tear, and maybe being more resilient than plugging the 3.5mm directly into the device. Imagine the travesty if it turned out that USB-C adapters turned out to be the solution to fragile headphones all along!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you taking a belt sander to it? That might be the difference.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

price is probably a big one, a $3 $10 $20 and $100 earbud will last wildly different amounts of time.