Asklemmy

43940 readers

613 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Who from history would you bring back to make them punished for the wrongs that they brought onto the world? (kbin.melroy.org)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mine is Henry Ford. He's the catalyst of the 40 hour work week and 5 days a week that has been standard to the present day. Because we're seeing now how little that really does for anyone anymore, where people are having to sacrifice more of their freedom to work second jobs or more hours than they should.

I don't think it's his fault directly for those reasons, but him thinking the 40 hour/5 day a week plan is a good one is just a poor reading into the future with the way it's gone since the establishment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. There are a lot of reasons to give Henry Ford shit, but the 40 hour workweek was one of the better things he did.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

he did.

*organized labor forced him to do.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nope, he did this one himself. The reason? His employees spent so much time at the factory, they didn't have time to actually buy his cars.

Yes, he improved working conditions to make a profit on his cars. A selfish reason, but it inadvertently helped us all.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago

Poltifact: "Mostly false"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

He paid his workers well enough that a majority of them could buy his cars?

Productivity reduction(or more likely accidents due to tired workers) might be relevant.