Funny: Home of the Haha

5760 readers

583 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

Other Communities:

/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
/c/[email protected] - General memes

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

489

It's time for a change (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

85 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It can be both, warm lights don't massively affect how cold/warm something is compared to other objects

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The light is clearly a cold light, and the reflection magnifies that effect. The sample is much less reflective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm no expert but, wouldn't this be the sheen/finish of the paint itself?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sure, but that doesn't change the fact that, due to the placement of the camera, we are not getting a fully accurate comparison. Need more neutral lighting for that.