this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
630 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4866 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 140 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The problem is that as a random cemetery worker who can't afford bodyguards 24/7, pressing charges stands a significant chance of getting you killed.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 2 months ago (4 children)

And doing nothing only emboldens them.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For sure. But as an individual, it makes a lot of sense to hide instead of fight.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As does the system of nothing happening to people like Trump, while also allowing him to use his platform to target his cult on his new "enemy". We need a system that will treat a former president accused of assault the same way the cops would respond to an alleged assault with a minority involved.

Until the system is actually going to work for the victim instead of caring about the optics of the assailant (or their "help"), I don't blame this woman for not wanting to put a target on herself for just doing her job and protecting the privacy/dignity of fallen soldiers and their families.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

president accused of assault

I keep seeing this sort of comment, as if Trump himself was involved. I'm still not clear if he was present at the altercation. Anyone know exactly where he was during all this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It was his campaign staff doing the assault, but you think their dear leader was just chilling in the car or something while this woman stepped in to shut down the illegal photoshoot happening? It was his campaign staff there illegally, I think that puts him on the hook for this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

In case you've forgotten, Trump has been more than accused of sexual assault.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why the fuck can't the police place charges anyway? Here in Canada any assault charge is automatic, it doesn't require the victim to do anything. Is that not true in the US?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Depends on the state and sometimes city.

I'm not sure what Arlington Cemetery actually counts as for law enforcement, but it's in Virginia, a former slave state.

Fun Fact: the property was confiscated from Robert E Lee following a tax dispute (they couldn't pay the back taxes they owed from the Civil War)

https://www.history.com/news/arlington-national-cemetery-robert-e-lee-estate

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The government can press charges on your behalf, but if you’re resistant they will often let the matter drop. It’s really hard to win a case like this if the victim refuses to testify.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah but there's video evidence in this case

That being said, I don't think the state should endanger a victim who is afraid for their safety and not consenting by making them go to trial

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You would sacrifice your life or your family to teach Trump a lesson?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Stormy Daniels could have disappeared very quietly. She chose to be a witness instead, and Trump has borne the fallout from that case seeing the light of day.

Look at all the #MeToo abusers who fell from power and public favor - their behavior was “known” publicly in their industry but not widely across the country - and so they remained in positions of power and influence to continue that abuse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

When has a MAGA fanatic gone out and attacked an individual that crossed Trump? I'm sure it's happened, but I can't think of a single incident. Does Pelosi's husband count? That felt more like a, "kill libs" thing, and she was a much higher profile target than you and I ever will be.

I'd press charges, be scared shitless and have guns salted around the house like Easter eggs. My kids would be staying inside unless we drove away to get outdoors. And my wife's pistol training would go from, "how to have fun safely" to "here's how self-defense works".

Shitty way to live? You fucking bet, but it would only be temporary, soon forgotten. A Trump Presidency would be permanent.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If Trump wins in November do you think he will spare your family that you protected by not teaching him a lesson?

Do you not think its cowardly to not stand up for your fellow citizens and instead stand for only yourself?

It's like Hurricane Katrina all over again. "Just leave the poors to suffer, fuck em, we are rich and escaped so who cares."

USA if falling apart because everyone cares about their own skins more than the collective.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

SO....you WOULD get your children killed so a Trump staffer gets a slap on the wrist? How does that help the collective again?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The fact that no one even considers organizing in reverse to protect this person against the crazies is really revealing, you know.

Black Panthers started because they knew they couldn't trust external forces to protect them.

Glad to know none of y'all will stand up for this persons family, and instead think them standing up to this would equal "killing their own kids" instead of you giving an inch and helping protect them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry, but you forgot to blame us all for Katrina again and therefore your point is invalid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Ray Nagin Crying GIF

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You’re the one calling her a coward. How is that protecting her? Start organizing and I’ll join you. Keep calling her a coward for refusing to step up with no protection and I’ll know you’re a hypocrite.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay, let's do it. How would you like to go about organizing? A GoFund me to fund people who can go there and stay vigilant? A meetup group or a change.org petition to get people aware of it? Both?

I'm being serious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know, man. If you start a gofundme I’ll donate, but in reality you’d need a mutual aid movement like the black panthers to protect against these militarized fascist thugs. Calling her a coward is bullshit, we can’t demand other people step up for martyrdom.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Okay, well, it looks like I actually need her contact information on GoFundMe to invite her to be a beneficiary of funds. I'm definitely not willing to put that in my own bank account, that's sketch. Further, I need their full name, which would appear on the GoFundMe page. So, I guess that's out.

https://support.gofundme.com/hc/en-us/articles/204993267-How-to-invite-a-beneficiary-to-receive-funds

Best bet is probably organizing a group, which is honestly the better solution, as you pointed out.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago

Man, fuck stochastic terrorism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This. And if they having been paying any attention, they can see that someone like Nancy Pelosi was even vulnerable to an attack from these demons. They came for her, but got her husband. And that's someone prominent like Nancy - imagine being a cemetary worker and knowing the kind of hate and vitriol and quite possibly, literal violence that would be aimed at you (and your family - these asshats are cowards to the core, of course).