Ask Lemmy

26734 readers

1480 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If you could have every answer to your history based questions, would you take them? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It turns out that something has been watching the Earth in minute detail since before the solar system was formed, down to a sub molecular level. It can give you the answers to any historical questions, but not things like what someone was thinking or feeling.

All the world's problems have been solved, and the information is only used with the strictest privacy, e.g. you can only get information on living people with their permission, or if you're a member of law enforcement solving a crime.

The question is, if you have a hobby, job, or other reason to research the past, like being a geologist or genealogist, would you take the answers, or would you prefer to do the research yourself?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I would for sure. I'm not even a historian or anything, I'm just a very curious person, and I like to come up with my own little theories for how and why things occur.

Also, I'd use it to figure out when my kids are lying. They all break my shit, but I want to know who to blame for what.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also, I'd use it to figure out when my kids are lying. They all break my shit, but I want to know who to blame for what.

That raises an interesting question - where would the balance be between their privacy and your rights as a parent. You need to know at least some of their private information to teach them as you raise them, but would something like the scenario you raised cross the line into being invasive?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The funny thing about being invasive is that it seems like it's only wrong if your suspicions are wrong.

If someone reads through all of their spouses texts, it's creepy and controlling, but as soon as they find the nudes from a coworker, we all agree that it's justified.

Rooting through your daughters diary is something that most will probably agree is out of line, but if it turns out they are planning to secretly meet with a grown man from the Internet, you'd be a hero.

I'm not really saying if it's right or not, it's just an observation I've had.