Science Memes

10940 readers

1703 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1386

Publishing Revenue (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why are we looking at revenue? We don't know the operating costs. What are the profit margins?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

According to Wikipedia, in 2022 Elsevier's revenue was 2.909 billion pounds and their net income was 2.021 billion pounds.

Not going to bother looking up the rest.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

There's a much more accurate stat... and it's disgusting

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alright but look at how much they pay the authors. What other business pays ZERO dollars for their core product?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

None, but science isn't a business. Treating it so creates perverse incentives where an articles is reviewed by merit of its financial gain and not its content. Some people already do this by prestige alone, but adding money to the mix won't improve this imo

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So it's acceptable for Elselvier et al to milk academics blind? At the minimum, authors should not be charged.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

No, but ideally all publishers should operate not-for-profit, and yep submission for open access should not cost ridiculous fees.