Space

8735 readers

42 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

300

SpaceX repeatedly polluted waters in Texas this year, regulators found (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Needs confirmation

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

0.133ug/l is the detection limit of the test

the rapport is saying is that there is no detectable mercury

SpaceX have since published a second statement confirming that there was a typo in the report, and stating that the mercury concentration is below detectable levels in most cases: https://x.com/SpaceX/status/1823378186836889699

Expand for tweet contents:

CNBC updated its story yesterday with additional factually inaccurate information.

While there may be a typo in one table of the initial TCEQ's public version of the permit application, the rest of the application and the lab reports clearly states that levels of Mercury found in non-stormwater discharge associated with the water deluge system are well below state and federal water quality criteria (of no higher than 2.1 micrograms per liter for acute aquatic toxicity), and are, in most instances, non-detectable.

The initial application was updated within 30 days to correct the typo and TCEQ is updating the application to reflect the correction.

So, pretty much what you surmised.