this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1247 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
4188 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR

  • Efforts like Graphene OS face increasing pressure from apps that refuse to run on non-standard Android.
  • The custom ROM project characterizes Google’s approach to device attestation as incomplete and flawed.
  • Graphene OS is prepared to take legal action if Google won’t let it pass Play Integrity checks.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’ve got old apps that won’t work any more.

That's true for every operating system. Old apps aren't updated to use new system APIs and such and they eventually stop working.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

On desktops we can use virtual environments, translation layers, plenty of solutions to make old programs and games work on a modern OS. Phones are somehow incapable of this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yet I can compile applications that work on Windows XP, and they still work under Windows 11.

It's not as if Android is some svelte slimline OS where every byte matters. There's plenty of room there for keeping compatibility with older apps.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Dude there's millions of lines of code and thousands of hours per year that keep old windows shit running. It's a nightmare to support that. Microsoft has made that a priority and you can easily argue it shouldn't be, but you seem convinced that's the only valid path. It's not.