this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
438 points (95.4% liked)

Political Memes

5230 readers
1804 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The thing that gets me is even when you up the age to 16, a common age of consent, you still have consent issues. 10 million dollars creates a consent issue for any poor person of any age. Are they truly making a choice? And I get that this is what sex workers already face.

But for fuck's sake our society seems far more willing to entertain this than just having a society where nobody needs sex work to not starve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Once one is of a consenting age, sex work is just work

The better question to ask is if it's morally acceptable to force someone to work to not starve? And then there's the whole exploitation of the global south thing.

And at least personally, I'd much rather do sex work than be a coal miner

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dude I’m poor and I’ll appreciate that $10M choice any day.

With $10M on the table, my poverty is now a choice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sure, just like a promotion becomes a choice for a woman under a misogynist boss when he propositions her. Consent cannot exist in such a power imbalance. And it's not your fault or her fault. It's us, it's the system making that shitty situation real. We can and should change the system so that nobody faces such a choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It can't exist? As an exaggeration, is there no way for a woman to meaningfully consent to an offer from her male boss to swap packed lunches? After all, he might take offense and pass her over for the promotion if she declines.

And if consent is possible in that scenario, what makes it immediately impossible in the scenario where sex or romance is involved?

It seems obvious that consent has to exist on some kind of spectrum like almost everything else. But it's spoken about and thought about in a very binary way. That seems problematic given how big a topic consent is lately.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Funny you should bring up food. In the military leaders are trained to eat after their troops, to never gamble with them, and in general never ask anything from them that isn't related to doing the job.

Because consent cannot exist in a power imbalance. So yes the lunch swap has the exact same problem. Just with less trauma counseling.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't you think taking that hard-line stance kind of corners you into taking some nonsensical positions?

For example a physical power imbalance will always exist between two men of different sizes. Because the imbalance is there, you have to answer with a hard no when someone asks: "is it possible for two men of different sizes to consent to sex with one another?" But if someone asks "is it okay for two guys of different sizes to have sex?" you would presumably say yes.

Now you have been forced to say it is okay for sex to happen despite the impossibility of any consent having being given.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Obviously the line gets drawn somewhere yes. Why 18 and not 19? Etc... I just had a good laugh because you stepped right in one.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You’re essentially saying that I’m incapable of economic consent, and I disagree because that dehumanizes me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'd say the system already did that.