this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

News

23296 readers
3211 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president and first lady threw their weight behind the presumptive Democratic nominee

Barack and Michelle Obama have endorsed Kamala Harris for the Democratic nomination for president, sharing the news in a joint phone call.

A video released by the campaign suggests the former president and first lady called Harris on Thursday while the vice president was in Houston, where she addressed the American Federation of Teachers and received a briefing on recovery efforts following Hurricane Beryl. 

“We called to say, Michelle and I couldn’t be prouder to endorse you and do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office,” Barack Obama is heard telling Harris in a 55-second video of the call. 

“This is going to be historic,” Michelle Obama tells Harris.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

This is frustrating. She couldn't handle a primary run 5 years ago. Now the entire Party is just lining up as if she's unquestionably the greatest candidate the world has to offer.

Prior to this, the only Democrat less popular than her, was Biden.

Nobody knows what she'll actually do in office because she's only ever said or supported whatever will help her at the moment.

EDIT: Thank you all. I had a good time today debating, discussing, reading, even occasionally learning.
Some of you engaged well, I upvoted. Some of you didn't. I rarely downvote though, and never did here.
I appreciate you all, and hope you all have a good one.
Even Kamala Harris. I hope to see her succeed beyond all our expectations. Even if mine are quite low.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

She isn’t on death’s door, she doesn’t want to jail people for pronouns, she supports a woman’s right to choose, the list goes on. The election is months away and it’s likely her vs trump.

Consider rolling up your sleeves and working on social and political causes to help see people and policies you like make it to the top. I have personally found it very fulfilling to volunteer at the local and state level in particular.

Love her or hate her, she is better than Trump in literally every way. The decision is obvious and complaining won’t put someone you like more on the ballot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Is that really the best we can hope for? Or ask for? Someone who's better than Trump?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In July, of an election year, in the US? Yes, that's the best you get.

Make a time machine, convince Biden to drop out 8-12 months ago, then you can have your open primary season.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's a plan, I can get behind.
But I would go to 5 years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why go 5 years when you could go back and ensure the convicted felon loses to Hilary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That's a good point. And a better plan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Is that really the best we can hope for?

Got any actual suggestions, or are you only here to complain that any candidate isn't a 100% perfect match for everything you want in the world?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought you were going to say:

"Is that really the best we can hope for? 'Working on social and political causes to help see people and policies you like make it to the top'?"

And I was like "yeah, it is the best we can hope for".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That is what I'm asking for. Everyone else seems content with backing a "winner".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if you understand. People are donating and volunteering, for Kamala Harris. You don't want more participation, You just want people to support your personally chosen candidate (who remains nameless).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen one I like this cycle. Neither major party has nominated one I really liked in 40 years. The Dems came close a couple times.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This sentiment is really impractical in a functional democracy of over 300 million people, if you can't find anyone in 20 candidates that have run over the past 40 years from the two major parties you were willing to vote for.

Your perfect candidate that you hold out for isn't going to be the perfect candidate for a lot of people. Part of the whole give and take is building consensus around most broadly acceptable candidates, rather than just taking your ball and going home when none of the viable candidates perfectly suite you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Oh I voted in every election since I could. Just never for someone I believed in. It was only ever hope.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

she was in a primary with biden in the center and about 15 other progressives on the left. she was always popular; it's just bernie occupied the left flank of the primary and everyone else was crumbs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Biden couldn't handle a primary run in 2008, but he killed in 2020.

Times change. Circumstances change. People change. And if the enthusiasm that has come out over the past week, both from her and from the party base, is any indication, Harris in 2024 is in a much better place than she was in 2020.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Biden didn't kill it in 2020. Bernie won the first few states, so the DNC freaked out and pushed the other candidates to drop out and endorse Joe. After that, the media lined up to declare him the presumptive nominee. The DNC hates progressives.

Kamala was a better speaker than Joe in 2020. Her comments about being one of the black kids on the busses aimed at Biden was accurate and scathing. But she followed the party mandate and bowed out.

Why is everyone's memory so short about these things?

She's a far sight better than Trump or Biden.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bernie won a couple states that never help determine the election. Then Biden won by a lot in swing states. If Bernie won swing states it would be different. He didn't. His appeal isn't and wasn't as good in the specific places the Presidency is won.

It sucks because I picked him in both primaries. But the reality is Biden had broader appeal where it mattered. Any Dem candidate is going get 170 EC votes along the coasts. It's between the coasts where the election is won. And Biden did better in all those places.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To my point, he was doing better until the others started to drop out. But that's all academic now. My opinion hardly matters, but I stand by my belief that the DNC hates progressive politics and would rather lose than support a populist progressive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Pete won Iowa, Bernie won New Hampshire and Nevada. Everyone (6 total candidates) was still in for South Carolina which Biden dominated. Pete and Amy dropped out at that point. But Bloomberg joined and Warren was still in. Gabbard was too but we all know was a joke candidate.

Biden was against 4 options going into Super Tuesday. Biden won 10 of the 15 primaries on Super Tuesday. Came in 2nd for the couple he didn't win. After that is when Bloomberg got chased back out, and Warren dropped out realizing she was stripping votes from Bernie.

Bernie was ahead for all of 3 weeks. And at that point only 3 states were in. What truly happened in that time is a lot of media spin. Because they had nothing much to report on and kept belaboring over almost nothing of consequence. By the time my chance landed here in Illinois it was obvious Biden had it in the bag. Bernie dropped out himself only a couple weeks after.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Oh. Look. It's the exact message we all knew was coming. "Good thing we got rid of Biden, but now we have another terrible candidate."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes! Exactly!
All the Democrats seem capable of, are terrible presidential candates. Obama seemed like a great candate for a ... Change. But turned out to be quite mid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

You know, obviously I disagree with you. But I respect you for not deleting your comments and for continuing to engage earnestly with people who were upset by it. I understand your disappointment with not ever getting a president who really moves the ball forward.

Until a progressive candidate can get elected in the swing states or there is a massive shift in the Overton window, I don't think you're going to get what you want. I'd like the world to be a better place, too. Shit, depending on the next 4 years, it's likely I won't live to see a liberal Supreme Court again, let alone tear down the corporate capture of our government.

Kamala has proven she can inspire people and that she can win. And I said before Biden even stepped down, if he goes, it has to be her or we risk losing black voters whom we can't win without. Now she's bringing them in droves. And the more registered Democrats, the greater our chances of really moving the country left in a meaningful way. She's the right choice, whether she's the best choice or not.

Anyway, be well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You know who else couldn't handle a primary run (twice) before they were elected president? Joe Biden.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yah. I don't know why anyone thought he was a good option either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And yet he won despite you not knowing why.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is winning the only hurdle? That's so depressing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When it comes to stopping Project 2025? Yes, that is the only hurdle. Work on the rest after that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's not something we'll ever "stop". That's an ongoing eternal fight. And you don't win by only playing defense. You need to try to score also.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We will never stop a specific agenda that has been laid out in great detail in a plan Americans are souring to the more they hear about it?

The sounds like what some people told me about Biden in 2020. Why vote for him? He's the same as Trump.

Except he isn't. By most measures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who said that? Did I? I never said any of that. Read my previous comment again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your previous comment:

That’s not something we’ll ever “stop”. That’s an ongoing eternal fight.

My response:

We will never stop a specific agenda that has been laid out in great detail in a plan Americans are souring to the more they hear about it?

Then I told you a different claim that your comment sounded like.

So yes, you did say that it is not something that we will never stop.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did the agenda get stopped? Project 2025 exists. So the right wing religous agenda is ongoing, is it not?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What a strange question. The agenda didn't get stopped because the election hasn't happened yet. Which is why they need to be beaten first so it can be stopped.

You do understand that it's called "Project 2025" because they want to implement it in 2025, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Project 2025 exists because electing Biden didnt stop anything. P25 is simply the latest label for the same agenda that's been going on since forever. That's what never ends.

The conservative religious right has waxed and waned for millennia. But it never stops.

You're missing the forest to the trees.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Okay, well then I guess we should give up. You're right, don't vote for Harris. She doesn't pass the purity test. Let Trump win.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I never had a chance to vote for her. I was never offered any other options. That's what my first comment was all about.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Did you canvass for anyone else to challenge Biden in a primary?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would there have been a debate if I had?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Possibly. But you clearly didn't canvass. If you're not going to put in the work to canvass for another candidate, it's pretty silly to complain that you weren't given a choice.

Candidates don't get on ballots by magic. It takes work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No they wouldn't. The party leaders were all in on Biden until 3 weeks ago. The last thing they want is for the public to choose "their" candate.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

That's a great excuse for never trying, isn't it? "They don't want us to do it."

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

This is a lot of work to justify doing and contributing nothing.