this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1557 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

5226 readers
2626 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1557
Unbelievable (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Murder. You're not going 75mph in a 25mph zone and trying not to kill people. Doesn't matter whether there was a specific target in mind.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

If you do it in a car it's all good. Evidently if you get killed by a speeding hunk of metal, it's really important to differentiate between the different sizes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Murder requires malice (i.e. intent), and you don't meet the standard of intent just by exceeding some level of recklessness/negligence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Driving 75mph in a 25mph zone is malicious and indicates intent to kill people.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, that's not how intent works. What it shows is recklessness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe that's not how it works by your definition of intent, but it certainly is how it works in mine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Right, and I'm not a prosecutor so I don't give a fuck about specific legal definitions.