this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
162 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37713 readers
213 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The news isn’t a surprise as Unity angered a lot of its loyal game developers a few weeks ago after pushing through a price increase based on numbers of downloads — and then retracted it after an uproar.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's an indication that they realized that the direction they were attempting to take wasn't working. It's a step in the right direction.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or he's just a scapegoat to recover some reputation and try again later.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Eh, if you want a scapegoat you generally wouldn't use the CEO for that. Plus, he is known for pushing shady practices at EA as well, so I have no doubt he was a major driving force behind their original monetisation scheme. I don't think they will try the same thing again, as it was just a really dumb idea that wouldn't have made sense for anyone, including Unity themselves who don't even have a reliable method of tracking installs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No need to try again. They already are implementing additional costs. 2 steps forward, 1 step back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

More like two back and one forward