this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5726 readers
1574 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Of all the things you could reasonably criticize the US over, wheelchair accessibility ain't one of them. Especially compared to Europe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I thought the idea was that Republicans are actively working on destroying what has been working fine and is benefitting lots of people, not just on preventing more progress.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's purposefully hyperbolic to illustrate a point. You think that Finland is seriously making all ice cream free?

I would not be the least bit surprised if all the Abbotts and Thomases and Trumps and Desantises (Desanti?) announced tomorrow that they would no longer be supporting the ADA's immoral drain on ~~commercial profits~~ governmental budgets.

And before someone points it out, gutting a system that he has personally benefited from to fuck over Texans is exactly the kind of thing Abbott would do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

They would never make the fish flavored ice cream free. The economy would collapse.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

My point is that it's not a good illustration.

Just read through some of the responses I've gotten. Some people think it's a good illustration because it's very plausible. Some because it's not at all plausible.

I'm saying it's not a good illustration because it's not at all plausible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Other than all the conservative efforts to destroy the ADA I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think it makes much difference whether or not it is plausible. It's just trying to communicate a message. I guess it has to be plausible enough that a reader can understand what it is even talking about; but not so plausible that the reader is led to believe this specific case is actually happening.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

On the other hand, disallowin wheelchair ramps because there are not mentioned in the Bible would be a very American move.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Equal access to every building? Sounds like a commie plot.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Americans are not the caricatures of evil and malice you seem to think we are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You are currently debating whether hospitals can let women die instead of performing abortions

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's painful to admit, but American politicians do not actually represent Americans. Over 80% of us believe abortion should be legal under some if not all circumstances. We are being held hostage by an ignorant minority.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/321143/americans-stand-abortion.aspx

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If your politicians don't represent the people, what the heck are they doing?

Or, why do your people still vote for them?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Because the party that most people don't vote for have become exceedingly adept at gaming the system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Then do something about it.

But your other party won't change it either, because they use the same loopholes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Of course we're not but "the supreme court bans something good because it's not explicitly allowed in a 200 year old document" is a goddamn accurate statement lol